Miller v. Stuart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ROBBIN Y MILLER CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 24-2890 ANDREW STUART ET AL SECTION “B”(2) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is defendants Andrew Stuart and TD Auto Finance’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (Rec. Doc. 3). Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion, so we will consider it unopposed. For the following reasons, IT IS ORDERED that defendants Andrew Stuart and TD Auto Finance’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (Rec. Doc. 3) be GRANTED IN PART, in accordance with this Order. Plaintiff’s claims based against…