Legal Opinion

State v. Arne

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 28, 1998No. 96-2077PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Defendant, Shain Curtis Arne, appeals two convictions of delivery of a controlled substance within a drug-free zone. See Iowa Code §§ 124.401(l)(c)(6), .401A (1995). He claims insufficient evidence supports his convictions and he alleges two instances of ineffective assistance of counsel. Arne also seeks to file a delayed petition for writ of certiorari to challenge an order of contempt. We conclude Arne’s drug convictions are supported by substantial evidence; we preserve the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims; and we deny permission to file a delayed petition for writ…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. State v. WeirSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. LeckingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. State v. CeaserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. State v. ButtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. State v. McPhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. State v. ScaliseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API