Legal Opinion
Karr v. Crabtree
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided October 8, 1998No. CS-95-543-JLQ, CR-91-055-JLQPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER’S AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITH PREJUDICE
QUACKENBUSH, Senior District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Petitioner Olaf Karr’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, heard without oral argument on October 6, 1998. Petitioner/Defendant is proceeding pro se. Assistant United States Attorney Thomas 0. Rice represents Respondent/Plaintiff. Having reviewed the record, and being fully advised in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the following…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (PS) CSPC Dophen Corporation v. HuDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- American National Property and Casualty Company v. WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Elias v. Fremont Carpet CleanersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022