Legal Opinion
(PS) CSPC Dophen Corporation v. Hu
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 20, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01895Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION, No. 2:17-cv-1895 MCE DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ZHIXIANG HU, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Defendant and counterclaimant, Dr. Zhixiang Hu, Ph.D., (“Dr. Hu”), is proceeding in this 18 matter pro se. (ECF No. 68.) Accordingly, this action has been referred to the undersigned 19 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are 20 Dr. Hu’s motion for leave for alternative service of process, plaintiff…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.