Legal Opinion

Woodson v. Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 29, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The appellant was convicted under an ordinance of the city of Fort Smith which provides as follows:

“Every-bawd, prostitute, or loose woman who shall, in said city, occupy or use any room or tenement for the purpose of prostitution or assignation, and every person who shall in said city suffer or permit any room or tenement in his or her possession or control to be kept, used or occupied for any such purpose, and every male person who shall frequent or visit any room or tenement so kept, used or occupied for the purpose of illicit intercourse, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Thatcher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. Batesville v. SmytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Sisemore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HesselmeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Binganan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API