Legal Opinion

Binganan v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 24, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of conviction for obtaining- money on a check under false pretenses. The appellant was first indicted-for forging and uttering a forged instrument in giving the check, and upon appeal to this court, upon a confession of error by the Attorney General, the cause wras reversed. Binganan v. State, 180 Ark. 266. Pending the appeal, the grand jury, without any further directions from the court, indicted appellant for obtaining money under false pretenses by the issuance of the check. He moved to dismiss the indictment as having been returned without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Binganan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Woodson v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Decker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Criner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API