Legal Opinion
United States v. Bliss
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided November 1, 1985No. 84-200C(1)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NANGLE, Chief Judge.
This case is now before this Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person. In this action, the United States sues for both injunctive relief and for recovery of clean-up costs under §§ 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. *129§§ 9606 and 9607, and § 7003 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. § 6973, in connection with six sites within the Eastern District of Missouri. As the United States alleges, these sites are contaminated by the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Calvert v. HuckinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1987
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
- Simmers v. American Cyanamid Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.