(PS) Olson v. Slote

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:16-CV-0956-DC-DMC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. and 14 PARTICIA SLOTE, et al., AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the 18 Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, ECF No. 18. 19 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who, as here, have 20 been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Under this 21 screening…