Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Woestemeyer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1930No. 29,548PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action in ejectment in which the plaintiffs, as abutting landowners on the north side of an abandoned railroad right of way, seek to recover from the defendants now in possession of a tract of land lying south of their land 150 feet in width which was part of the 200-foot tract formerly used as right of way by the railway company. A general denial was filed by defendants. A stipulation was filed covering all the facts. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

The real controversy arises concerning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Barker v. LashbrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Taylor Investment Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HumbergCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API