Legal Opinion

Villarreal v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1968No. 41356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, three years.

The first ground of error is that the trial court excluded the testimony of To-var, the injured party, on cross-examination, that he had been indicted and convicted for aggravated assault upon Frutoso Garcia, Jr.

The misdemeanor conviction was not for an offense involving moral turpitude. The exclusion of such testimony was not error. The ground of error is overruled. 62 Tex.Jur.2d 244, Sec. 271; 1 Branch 2d 211, Sec. 191; Oakley v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 371, 1 S.W.2d 294.

Error is urged on the ground…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seefurth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Sockwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Oakley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Rojas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  4. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Grundstrom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API