Legal Opinion

Gill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1974No. 49034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, life.

Appellant contends he was denied a reasonable time to present written objections to the charge as guaranteed him by Article 36.14, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. The sentence of that article at issue provides:

“Before said charge is read to the jury, the defendant or his counsel shall have a reasonable time to examine the same and he shall present his objections thereto in writing, distinctly specifying each ground of objection.” (Emphasis added.)

Following dictation of his objections to the court reporter, appellant objected to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Baity v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Seefurth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  2. Mullins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Daniell Mya Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. Daniell Mya Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API