Swoope v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
The refusal of the affirmative charge and several rulings of the court upon the testimony aré' relied upon as error to effect a reversal of the judgment of conviction appealed from ip this case.
The indictment contained two counts. Count 1 charged the defendant and others with burglary of the storehouse of R. F. Mooney. Count 2 charged them with buying, receiving, concealing, etc., certain designated property or merchandise alleged to have been stolen from the said Mooney knowing that it Was stolen, and. not having the intent to restore it to the owner. Upon arraignment this defendant demanded…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex parte AcreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Cannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- Jordan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Chaney v. Burford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- Freeland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
- Allen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Foster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- Erskine v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.