Legal Opinion

Scollo v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this negligence action in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident, defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint alleging that plaintiff has failed to meet the threshold requirement of having sustained a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). For reasons which follow, we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted.

*763Plaintiff was injured on May 10, 1979. According to the report of Dr. Naumann, whom she consulted at that time, she sustained a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Nolan v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Nolan v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oswin v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  2. Padron v. HoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Doyle v. Erie County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Fields v. Green Bus Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Olmstead v. StrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API