Padron v. Hood
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
On August 22, 1983, the plaintiffs were involved in a two-vehicle accident in the County of Queens. The plaintiffs were allegedly injured as a result of that accident.
Special Term determined that the plaintiffs failed to meet *719the threshold requirement of a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (formerly § 671 [4]). Specifically, Special Term found that the plaintiffs had failed to allege facts sufficient to indicate the extent of limitation of a body organ, member, function or system attributable to their injuries, and thus granted U.S. Furniture’s cross motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Filippo v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Savage v. DelacruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Nolan v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Popp v. KremerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pagano v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Covington v. CinnirellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Dyszel v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Oswin v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Palmer v. AmakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.