Workman v. Rhodes
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Martin Circuit Court; James W. Ogdon, Judge. Action by Ott Workman against Elvett B. Rhodes. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.
Appellant filed his complaint against appellee in two paragraphs, the first being on a promissory note and the second on an account. Issues were joined by an answer in general denial. Trial was had by the court, with finding for appellee and judgment accordingly. Appellant filed his motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and this action of the trial court *414is the only error properly assigned in this court and relied on for reversal.
In appellant’s motion for a new trial the following reasons are assigned therefor: (1) The finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence. (2)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gates v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Lynch v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Beavers v. BessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Schilling v. QuinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Nicholson v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Lafayette v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Zaring v. Home Stove Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Boren v. SchweitzerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917