Blum v. Van Vechten
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee «county: D. H. Johnson-, Circuit Judge. ' On the 24th of December, 1894, Simon Dittenhoefer filed ids complaint against Charles Hochstadter in the circuit •court for Milwaukee county, setting up that Dittenhoefer, the plaintiff, and the defendant, Hochstadter, were, and for -a considerable time had been, copartners in keeping a -clothing store or stores and the selling of ready-made clothing, hats, caps, and furnishing…
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee «county: D. H. Johnson-, Circuit Judge. ' On the 24th of December, 1894, Simon Dittenhoefer filed ids complaint against Charles Hochstadter in the circuit •court for Milwaukee county, setting up that Dittenhoefer, the plaintiff, and the defendant, Hochstadter, were, and for -a considerable time had been, copartners in keeping a -clothing store or stores and the selling of ready-made clothing, hats, caps, and furnishing goods, stating the terms of •said partnership; that they owned and operated two stores, ■one at St. Paul, Minnesota, and…
1Opinion of the CourtFinney, J.
The appellants’ counsel concedes that it would be a contempt of the court appointing him to interfere with a receiver’s possession of property pertaining to his trust and received by him in that capacity, and that an actual levy on property, or attachment of the same, could not be made without leave of the court which appointed him. This ■concession is fatal to the plaintiffs’ contention in support of •the garnishment of the receiver; for, if the process of garnishment should be effectively prosecuted, it would necessarily result in depriving the receiver of the property rightfully in his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kinney v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
- Van Alstyne v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Law v. FordNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
- Wood v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
- Irwin v. McKechnieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Evans v. RectorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- SEAMAN PAPER CO. OF MASSACUHSETTS, INC. v. PolskyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Arthur v. BrendelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991