Legal Opinion

Raji v. Bank Sepah-Iran

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. On the court’s own motion, cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that plaintiffs, having stipulated to reducing the amount of *917damages to which they are entitled, are not aggrieved by the modification for purposes of appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Smith v Hooker Chem. & Plastics Corp., 69 NY2d 1029; Dudley v Perkins, 235 NY 448).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dudley v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Smith v. Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oropallo v. TeclerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re Elmer Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Northern Leasing Sys., Inc. v. KollarsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017