Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 9, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for leave to appeal granted. Cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff, having stipulated to reducing the amount of damages to which he is entitled, is not aggrieved by the modification for purposes of appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 96, at 408-409, and n 62; Dudley v Perkins, 235 NY 448, 457).
Judge Simons taking no part.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dudley v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDougald v. GarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Goodman v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Pozzanghera v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Raji v. Bank Sepah-IranNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Barber v. HelwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.