In Re Kirschke
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
A jury found petitioner Jack Kirschke guilty of two counts of murder for the killing of his wife and her lover and found the murder to be of the first degree. We affirmed the resulting judgment of conviction in an unpublished opinion (Crim. No. 16044) and the judgment became final upon denial of Kirschke’s petition for hearing to the Supreme Court. In these collateral attacks upon the judgment, Kirschke asserts that it should be. vacated for error of constitutional dimension which denied him a fair trial. He contends: (1) the conviction is the product of false testimony of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re WaltreusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re HochbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re KirschkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re PrattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- In Re PrattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980