Legal Opinion
Rumpke Waste, Inc. v. Henderson
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 30, 1984No. C-1-83-1123PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This case arises out of a zoning resolution adopted by the Pike Township Board of Trustees in May 1983. Plaintiffs claim that this resolution deprives them of their property rights without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. They assert first that it was the intent of the Trustees and of the Pike Township Zoning Commissioners in adopting the resolution to exclude totally sanitary landfills. Secondly, they argue that the resolution is unconstitutionally vague. Third, they…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- BFI Waste Systems of North America v. Dekalb CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Apple Group, Ltd. v. Granger Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- West Chester Township Zoning v. FrommOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- MacHnics v. Sloe, 2007-G-2784 (3-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.