Legal Opinion
New York, Chicago & St. Louis Raiload v. Perdiue
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 1, 1933No. 14,329PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
— This was an action for a restraining order and permanent injunction against the appellees, L. V. Perdiue, a Notary Public, Charles P. Noell, and Charles L. Moore, attorneys, and Claude Stevens, Charles Michaels, Herschel Johnson, and L. Ewbank, witnesses, to restrain and enjoin them and each of them respectively from taking testimony and certifying to any deposition; from in any manner representing one Maude J. Hamilton, administratrix of the estate of James C. Meek, in the taking of said depositions in the state of Indiana; and to restrain said witnesses from giving their depositions in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Kern v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ShellyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abney v. AbneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Mahan v. GuntherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Jallali v. National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Alspaugh v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- McConnell, Admx. v. Thomson, Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937