Legal Opinion

Twin City Apartments, Inc. v. Landrum

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1980No. 7921DC601PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The defendant contends the trial judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss this suit on the grounds that the instant action for summary ejectment must be brought as a compulsory counterclaim, pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 13(a), in the pending Hertford County action. Rule 13(a) states that,

A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim and does not require for its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . SimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Hy-Way Heat Systems, Inc. v. Jadair, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
  3. Powell Manufacturing Co. v. Harrington Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Cloer v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Brooks v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Holloway v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Jonesboro United Methodist Church v. Mullins-Sherman Architects, L.L.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API