Legal Opinion

Powell Manufacturing Co. v. Harrington Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1976No. 766SC100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Appellant contends that its Mecklenburg County complaint is not a compulsory counterclaim because it does not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as that alleged in appel-lee’s Bertie County claim. We disagree.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 18(a), provides in pertinent part that:

“A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Fruit Co. v. Standard Fruit and Steamship Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
  2. Hy-Way Heat Systems, Inc. v. Jadair, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twin City Apartments, Inc. v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Brooks v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API