Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1964No. 31682PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. F. COTTEY, Special Judge.

Condemnees appeal from a judgment in their favor which they contend is grossly inadequate. Two rulings by the trial court form the basis of their complaint, one on the admissibility of evidence of the price paid by them for their land as bearing on its value, and the other on the qualification of a witness to express an opinion as to its value. It is necessary to notice only such facts as bear on those points.

Condemnee Henderson, testifying on behalf of himself and his wife as the first witness in the case, established that they are the owners of a 30.99-acre tract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. VasquezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. City of St. Louis v. Paramount Shoe Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Rauscher Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. PopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Union Electric Company of Missouri v. SimpsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kirst v. Clarkson Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Neavill Ex Rel. Neavill v. KlempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Missouri Commercial Investment Co. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HeimMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Board of Public Buildings v. GMT Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API