Legal Opinion

Bank v. . Drug Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. This action was brought to recover the amount of a note for $499.20, payable in fixed installments to the Equitable Manufacturing Company. There was written, on its back, an indorsement to the plaintiff, but there was no proof introduced by the plaintiff of the genuineness of the indorsement, the court ruling that the production of the note was sufficient to show that the plaintiff was its equitable owner, without any proof that the note had been indorsed in writing to it, as the plaintiff does not claim as an innocent purchaser or a holder in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Bank v. Hay.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Tyson v. Joyner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Swindell v. . LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Gregg v. . Mallett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Sheldon v. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Sullivan v. GaulSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Texas Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API