Legal Opinion
State v. Stewart
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 10, 2003No. AC 22465PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Pierre Stewart, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the preponderance of the evidence *395showed that he was dependent on drugs at the time of the charged offense and (2) his conviction for violating § 21a-278 (b) is invalid because the statutory definitions for drug dependence are void for vagueness.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. Francis D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. FernandezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. RoccoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Bennett-GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. SmallsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. TozierConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. NorthropConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.