Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Constantine

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*895OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael W. Duskas, J.

THE PARTIES

The petitioner is the duly elected District Attorney of St. Lawrence County. Respondent Constantine is the Superintendent of the New York State Police; the respondent DeFrancesco is Chief Inspector of the New York State Police; the respondent Hook is Deputy Chief Inspector of the New York State Police; and respondent Lawliss is Commander of Troop B of the New York State Police, which troop encompasses St. Lawrence County.

THE FACTS

Petitioner prosecuted an indictment in the County Court of St. Lawrence County against one James Whitton. Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Boryszewski v. BrydgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Morgenthau v. CookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Associated General Contractors v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Police Conference of New York, Inc. v. Municipal Police Training CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gardner v. ConstantineNew York Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API