Legal Opinion

Haldeman v. Haldeman

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1962No. Civ. 10255PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

Mary Haldeman was awarded an interlocutory decree of divorce from Thomas Haldeman on the ground of extreme cruelty. Although appellant-wife appeals from the whole judgment, she assigns as error: (1) The trial court’s finding that a pharmacy business is solely the respondent’s separate property, (2) its failure to make a finding on the issue of alimony, and, (3) its failure to award her alimony.

The parties were married on May 3, 1937, and separated on November 25, 1959, because of respondent’s involvement with another woman. They have one child, a daughter, who at the time of the trial was 16…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cavanaugh v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Millington v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API