Cook v. Chagollan
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Della M Cook, No. CV-25-01139-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Araceli Chagollan, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pro se Plaintiff Della Cook (“Plaintiff”) has filed an Application to Proceed in 16 District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Cost (Doc. 2). Upon review, Plaintiffs’ 17 Application, signed under penalty of perjury, indicates that she is financially unable to pay 18 the filing fee. The Court will grant Plaintiff’s Application and allow her to proceed in 19 forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court will…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.