Legal Opinion

People v. Furman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Exceptions "before judgment from Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Information for keeping saloon open on Sunday. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The respondent was a saloon-keeper, and on December 9, 1890, was convicted, under the liquor law of 1887, of having kept his saloon open on Sunday, August 24, 1890. He pleaded a former conviction in bar, to which plea the prosecution demurred, and the demurrer was sustained.

The plea sets forth that respondent was arrested upon the complaint of the city marshal on August 25, 1890, *111charging him with having kept his saloon open on said 24th day of August, contrary to an ordinance of the city of Adrian, entitled “An ordinance relative to maintaining quiet and good order;” that he was convicted of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kitson v. Mayor of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Village of Northville v. WestfallMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sherlock v. StuartMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pleasant Grove City v. LindsayUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hopkins v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Board of Supervisors of Saginaw Co. v. HubingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API