State v. Whitlock
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
This appeal by the State was taken and perfected under the provisions of Title 15, Section 369, Code 1940. Said section deals solely with appeals in habeas corpus cases.
In the instant proceedings it appears that the essential provisions of the Statute, supra, have been substantially complied with.
Petitioner appellee filed a petition for habeas corpus before the Probate Judge of Conecuh County. At the hearing, the sheriff’s return showed that he was held by virtue of a warrant of the Governor of Alabama upon request of the Governor of North Carolina, in that petitioner…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Pool v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Godwin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- State v. ThurmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Payne v. GrahamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Lynn v. WrightAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- State v. HolmesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990