Legal Opinion

State v. Whitlock

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1946No. 3 Div. 879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This appeal by the State was taken and perfected under the provisions of Title 15, Section 369, Code 1940. Said section deals solely with appeals in habeas corpus cases.

In the instant proceedings it appears that the essential provisions of the Statute, supra, have been substantially complied with.

Petitioner appellee filed a petition for habeas corpus before the Probate Judge of Conecuh County. At the hearing, the sheriff’s return showed that he was held by virtue of a warrant of the Governor of Alabama upon request of the Governor of North Carolina, in that petitioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Pool v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Godwin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. State v. ThurmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Payne v. GrahamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Lynn v. WrightAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Tolbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. State v. HolmesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API