Legal Opinion
Pool v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 1918No. 6 Div. 304PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County ; Wm. E. Fort, Judge. Habeas corpus by B. E. Pool against the State of Alabama. Motion to quash the return was overruled, and petitioner appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.
The warrant issued by the Governor of this state on the requisition of the Governor of the state of Oklahoma is attached to and made a part of the return to the writ of habeas corpus, and recites that:
“Whereas, his excellency,. R. L. Williams, Governor of the state of Oklahoma, by requisition dated the 16th day of October, 1916, has demanded of me, as Governor of the state of Alabama, the surrender of B. E. Pool, who, it appears, is charged by affidavit, in the county of Washita in said state, with the crime of obtaining money by bogus check (a duly certified copy of which affidavit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Kingsbury's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Sanders v. SteenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. ParrishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Kelley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- State v. SheltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
- Thacker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Adams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.