Legal Opinion

Earnmoor v. California Ins. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 6, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Admiralty. Action on a policy of insurance.

1Opinion of the CourtBeown, J.

The libel is filed to recover upon a maritime policy insuring “Alfred Earnshaw, on account of whom it may concern, in case of loss, to he paid to him or order.” Exceptions are taken that the libel does not allege (1) any order or transfer from Earnshaw; nor (2) that the libelant had any interest in the policy when issued; nor (3) that the vessel was seaworthy.

1. The libel alleges that the libelant, at all times hereinafter mentioned, was the owner of the ship, and that “said insurance was made for and on behalf of the libelant.” As the policy is expressed to be issued “on account of whom it…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Merchant Marine Ins. v. Liberty Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  2. Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Globe Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. Nome Beach Lighterage & Transportation Co. v. Munich Assur. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1903
  4. Franklin Sugar-Refining Co. v. FunchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
  5. Merino v. Globe Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API