Legal Opinion

Raymer v. United States

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 19, 1979No. C 76-0119-L(B)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM CONTAINING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BALLANTINE, District Judge.

This matter was heard by the Court without a jury on November 30 and December 1, 1978. It is now before the Court for findings of fact, conclusions of law and entry of a judgment.

FINDINGS OF FACT(1) Plaintiff, Gwynith Raymer, is the duly qualified administratrix of the estate of Ronald Raymer, deceased, and Marilyn Gill is the duly qualified administratrix of the estate of David R. Gill, deceased. (Stipulation with respect to facts, exhibits and certain other matters filed November 30, 1978 [hereafter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hess v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vera Zabala Clemente v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Smith's Administratrix v. Middlesboro Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Haddad v. Louisville Gas & Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Raymer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1981
  3. Raymer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API