Legal Opinion

Union Savings & Trust Co. v. Manney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1918No. 14272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered December 4, 1916, in favor of tbe defendants, in an action to set aside a deed and subject property to tbe lien of a judgment, tried to tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

In this action plaintiff, a judgment creditor of defendants as a marital community, seeks *275to set aside a deed from defendant husband to defendant wife conveying block 1, and lots 4 to 9, both inclusive, in block 2, of Manney’s addition to the city of Seattle, and to subject that property to the lien of the judgment.

The facts are these: Defendants were married in 1883. They came to Seattle some twenty-seven years ago, at which time, the wife testified, “We had just barely enough money to bring us here.” In the fall of 1904, the partnership of W. F. Manney & Company was' formed, consisting of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In re the Estate DeschampsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Heintz v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Abbott v. WetherbyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Graves v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Lanigan v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rucker v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. Hill Et Ux. v. Du PrattNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Million v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API