Legal Opinion

UDGAWA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1974No. 2262PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2262 MATTER OF UDAGAWA In Exclusion Proceedings A-20300772 Decided by Board February 13, 1974 Applicant, who will supervise and train American workers as tempura cooks at a Japanese restaurant and will assist in the preparation of meals during the training period, is inadmissible as an employee of a treaty investor under section 101(aX15XEXii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, since he will not be employed in a "responsible capacity" within the meaning of 22 CFR 41.41. [Matter of Tamura,

10 I. & N. Dec. 717

(Reg. Corn. 1964), overruled] ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: William J.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. TAMURABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. TIJAMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
  2. Kun Young Kim v. District Director of the U. S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. WALSH AND POLLARDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  4. NAGOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
  5. HARRISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API