Legal Opinion

Milby v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1903No. 1,046PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky.

1Opinion of the Court

DAY, Circuit Judge.

In a former case against the same defendant this court had occasion to consider the offense charged in the alleged fraudulent use of the mails of the United States in sending the letter set out in the present indictment. Milby v. U. S. 48 C. C. A. 574, 109 Fed. 638. In that case the only question for determination was as to the validity of the indictment. The letter which was the basis of the scheme for the fraudulent use of the -mails is set forth in full in the statement of the case preceding the opinion of Judge Clark. It is a proposition to sell counterfeit money. It is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Streep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Horman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Culp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Lemon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Sandals v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  5. Post v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API