Legal Opinion
Mattocks v. Daylin, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-147 EriePublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
WEBER, Chief Judge.
A jury trial in the above-entitled action concluded on September 15, 1977, with a finding of no liability against defendant Daylin, Inc. Prior to trial of the action, third party defendant Sulleraft Manufacturing Company (Sulleraft) filed a third party Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against a new third party defendant, Insurance Company of North America (INA).
Sullcraft’s Complaint for declaratory relief requested this Court to declare that the claims asserted against Sulleraft were covered by the vendor’s endorsement issued by INA in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Pacific Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
3Cited by17 opinions
- Weaver v. CCA Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Kelmo Enterprises, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- American White Cross Laboratories, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Industrial Chemical v. Hartford Acc. & Indem.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Pep Boys v. Cigna Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.