Crabtree Vickers, Inc. v. United States

Landis, Judge:

Plaintiff bas filed a motion for rehearing of Crabntree Vickers, Inc. v. United States, 79 Cust. Ct. 13, C.D. 4707 (1977) on tbe sole basis set out in plaintiff’s memorandum “that tbe Court did not rule expressly on the effect of General Interpretative Rule 10(b) pertaining to classification of articles whether finished or not finished.” (Emphasis quoted.)

As pointed out in defendant’s brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for rehearing, plaintiff’s original brief, although it quoted both paragraphs (h) and (ij) of General Interpretative Rule 10, did not discuss either one.…