Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Burns

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 7, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On. bill for reformation of deed of conveyance. On hearing on motion to strike out bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

Complainants’ amended bill is for reformation of a deed of conveyance of real estate made by complainants to- defendant. Defendant now moves to strike out the amended bill on the ground “that there are no facts set forth as alleged in said bill which would entitle the complainants to the relief prayed for therein.”

The general rule touching reformation of written instruments, as early stated in,our federal supreme court, cannot be questioned: “Where an instrument is drawn and executed, which professes, or is intended, to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Tucker v. MaddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scult v. Bergen Valley Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. S.P. Dunham Co. v. 26 E. State St. Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Katchen v. SilbermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  4. Garner v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Joffe v. GliksmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API