Legal Opinion

Katchen v. Silberman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 25, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill filed by complainant for the reformation of a deed made by her to defendants in October, 1926, so that the defendant grantees assume a mortgage in the sum of $12,000 held by the Druggist Building and Loan Association. The agreement for the sale of the property states the consideration to be $14,500, made up as follows: Cash, $1,000; assumption of mortgage, $12,000; second mortgage, $1,500. The defendants also agreed to pay the back shares of the building and loan mortgage in cash at the time of closing title, and complainant agreed to assign the said shares.

The deed does not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cochran v. BurnsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  2. Mayer v. West Side Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scult v. Bergen Valley Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Paz v. DeSimoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Joffe v. GliksmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API