Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1949No. 7 Div. 25Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

The offense incident to this charge and conviction is using abusive, insulting, or obscene language. Title 14, Sec. 11, Code 1940.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury.

It is insisted in brief of counsel for appellant that the affidavit is insufficient.

The question cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. This is attempted here. Wells v. State, 245 Ala. 510, 17 So. 2d 878; Vinson v. State, 26 Ala.App. 48, 152 So. 259.

The evidence for the State amply supports the judgment of conviction. The appellant admitted that he was present at the place in question, but ■ denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Vinson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API