Vinson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
Prom a judgment of conviction for bastardy this appeal was taken.
Errors are assigned as the law requires in cases of this character.
On the trial in the court below the defendant offered no evidence. The evidence of the state was amply sufficient to meet the required rule, and therefore to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered in accordance therewith. Moreover, this question was not presented on the trial, as there was no request for the affirmative charge, nor a motion for a new trial. England v. State, 23 Ala. App. 393,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- England v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Looney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Dothan v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Bush v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
- Eatman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Baggett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.