Gustafson v. Lindquist
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan
It is contended by defendant in this appeal that a judgment entered against him on a promissory note, after a bench trial, was against the manifest weight of the evidence in that a portion of the note sued upon was not supported by consideration. Three promissory notes are involved, and it appears from the record that plaintiff, an employee in a small machine shop owned by defendant and another person, loaned *1,000 to defendant to enable him to purchase his partner’s share of the business. In return, defendant gave plaintiff the first note for *1,000 at 6% interest. There are certain basic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First National Bank of Elgin v. AchilliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- American National Bank v. WoolardIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Chambers v. John T. Shayne & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Widmer v. WidmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Walden v. BournAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DiLorenzo v. Valve and Primer Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Stolzenbach v. PagoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Davis v. BuchholzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Hux v. WoodcockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Pedott v. DormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.