Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Webster Computer Corp.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtMissal, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered for the defendant arising out of an alleged contractual relationship of the parties.
The court’s finding of facts may be summarized as follows: The defendant, a foreign corporation, was primarily engaged in the business of providing computer systems for large companies and was qualified to do business in the state of Connecticut. The plaintiff was also a foreign corporation qualified to do business in the state of Connecticut. The defendant also acted as computer consultants through its branch known as “executive search.” As a consultant, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Shakro v. HaddadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- W. G. Maltby, Inc. v. Associated Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- The Telex Corporation v. D. E. BalchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- C. & C. Electric Motor Co. v. D. Frisbie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donovan v. Freeway Construction Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1982