Legal Opinion

Hammacher v. Wilson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is a bill charging infringement of letters patent No. 169,931, granted November 16, 1875, to William E. Ulman, for an improvement in piano-forte pedals. The respondent admits the validity of the patent, and the infringement, but justifies under a license made to him June 1, 1877, by Jacob Ulman, who was then the owner of the letters patent. The complainants reply that the license was revoked and canceled August 13, 1880, by William F. Ul-man, who was then the owner of the letters patent, in accordance with the provisions of the license, and on account of failure by respondent to perform…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eno Systems, Inc. v. EnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Ohio Citizens Trust Co. v. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1944
  3. Platt v. Fire-Extinguisher Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
  4. Foster Hose Supporter Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  5. Morpul, Inc. v. Crescent Hosiery MillsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API