Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Satterlee (In re Anderson)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1994No. 92-35120PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
Vincent Anderson and Charolette Anderson (the “Andersons”), husband and wife, appeal the district court’s affirmance of a bankruptcy court order denying confirmation of their Chapter 13 personal bankruptcy plan. Herb Satterlee, the Trustee, maintains that the bankruptcy court and district court correctly interpreted 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B) to require, as a prerequisite to Chapter 13 confirmation, that a plan provide that the debtor pay all actual disposable income to the Chapter 13 trustee during the life of the plan. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Education Assistance Corporation v. William Wesley ZellnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In Re SlusherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- In Re KolbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.