Legal Opinion
Kinsky v. 154 Land Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 2012No. ED 96854PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Presiding Judge.
Introduction
Carl D. Kinsky appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of 154 Land Company (154) both on the merits and on the basis of res judicata and collateral estoppel. We affirm.
Baclcground
This lawsuit stems from the following facts. Areaco was the original owner and developer of Rocky Ridge Ranch, now Grayhawk Subdivision (Grayhawk). On April 12, 1966, Areaco executed a governing agreement (Agreement), which was to last for a period of 20 years, allowing extensions by additional terms of 20 years. The Agreement provided that it…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Edwards v. City of EllisvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Unverferth v. City of FlorissantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Xiaoyan Gu v. Da Hua Hu, and ACE INA Insurance Company Canada, Defendants/Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. David TrimmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Sampson v. Georgia Department of Juvenile JusticeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.