Legal Opinion

United States v. 0.28 Acres of Land

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided December 3, 2004No. 1:02CV00201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JONES, Chief Judge.

In this condemnation action by the United States, I am called upon to determine if a lessee continues to have an interest in the property condemned, or whether such interest was forfeited by a failure to pay rent. Based on the record, I find that the lessee has no compensable interest in the property.

I

The United States, acting by the Secretary of the Army, has condemned the real property that is the subject of this case in connection with the Army Corps of Engineers’ Grundy, Virginia, Nonstructural Flood Control Project. The property, taken by declaration…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  2. Fedynich v. LozanoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API