Parker v. Robertson
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
Defendants Joshua Robertson and Jaime Rice have a filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 41), to which the plaintiff has filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 48), and the'moving defendants have filed a Reply (Docket No. 52). For the reasons stated herein, the moving defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in' part, the plaintiffs federal malicious prosecution claims will be dismissed, and the plaintiffs remaining state law malicious prosecution claims will proceed to trial.
BACKGROUND
I. Facts
On February 24, 2010, the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tulis v. OrangeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023